Whatever happened to Baby Spice?

What is wrong with this picture?


Yes, that’s right – no Baby Spice (now I come to think of it, the title of this post might have been something of a giveaway…).

These four tiny Spice Girls ‘In my Pocket’ books arrived at the UL under legal deposit in April 1998. Because of their size, they were put into an MR classmark, which has a size ‘e’ category for volumes that are smaller than 16 cm.  They have had quite a few outings over the last few years, as we began including them in the exhibitions we put on as part of our tours of the music department. The reasoning behind this was partly to demonstrate the eclectic nature of our collections (!) and partly because the tiny, brightly-coloured books look rather good as part of an exhibition – especially as a sharp contrast to the huge 16th century choirbook which also makes regular appearances in exhibitions.


Pencil for scale!


Putting out a recent exhibition, somebody noticed the problem with this set – we were missing a Spice Girl! I’m not sure how I’d managed to not notice this up until then, but it was unsettling to know that poor Emma had not arrived safely at the UL with the rest of the group. Looking at other libraries’ collections, and at legal deposit records, showed us that she was also missing  from the set in other legal deposit libraries, despite having been published at exactly the same time. She had arrived safely at the British Library, but nowhere else that we could see, despite the other books in the set having arrived in several places under the Legal Deposit Act. Curiouser and curiouser…

This state of affairs was not to be borne, and a quick internet search and a few days waiting eagerly for the post resulted in Baby Spice being happily reunited with the rest of the gang.

Spice 3

If there is a moral to this tale, I suppose it would be never to assume that things have arrived under legal deposit. If anyone has a rational explanation of the Mystery of the Missing Spice Girl, we would be delighted to hear your theory!





This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Whatever happened to Baby Spice?

  1. littlemissnemo says:

    Oh, I laughed out loud, literally a LOL! Thank you for the reminder that there’s more to culture than the merely ‘high brow’! It’s deeper and more varied and richer than some like to think; such a diversity gives the scholar much-needed perspective – and sense of humour! I’d like to add that, although Posh Spice came in for a lot of stick about her singing, Victoria-skeptics were actually pleasantly surprised by the single from her final solo album – quite rightly so…it was a nice song. And I say that as a musicology-trained person who adores singing C16th polyphony!
    Keep posting, Kate!!
    P.S. It looks like the Poikilographia book images you kindly sent me will get their outing at long last come December – I will be sure to ‘big up’ (hehe) the Library.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Kate says:

      Hehe, thank you, glad you enjoyed it! I think I am going to have to give Posh Spice’s solo album a listen over the weekend… Great to hear that the Poikilographia photos are proving useful!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.